Sanskrit
बहूनि मे व्यतीतानि जन्मानि तव चार्जुन । तान्यहं वेद सर्वाणि न त्वं वेत्थ परन्तप ॥
bahūni me vyatītāni janmāni tava cārjuna tāny ahaṃ veda sarvāṇi na tvaṃ vettha parantapa
Translation
Many births have been left behind by Me and by thee, O Arjuna. I know them all, but thou knowest not thine, O Parantapa.
Annie Besant · The Bhagavad-Gita, translated by Annie Besant (4th ed., 1922) — Wikisource · Public Domain
Explanation
Rather than defend the chronology Arjuna just questioned, Krishna asserts something larger: both of them have had many births, his own difference being that he remembers all of his while Arjuna remembers none of his own. This is the reincarnation doctrine from Chapter 2 (verses 2.13, 2.22) reapplied specifically to Krishna, and it quietly answers verse 4’s objection by denying that “birth” limits him the way it limits Arjuna. The distinguishing mark is memory across lives, not exemption from them — Krishna’s continuity of awareness is what makes his “births” different in kind. The ātman argument of chapter 2 is here made asymmetric: same cycle, different relationship to it.
Study deeper
Word by word
- bahūni me vyatītāni janmāniबहूनि मे व्यतीतानि जन्मानि
- many are my past births (bahūni + me + vyatītāni + janmāni)
- tava cārjunaतव चार्जुन
- and yours, O Arjuna (tava + ca + arjuna)
- tāny ahaṃ veda sarvāṇiतान्य् अहं वेद सर्वाणि
- I know them all (tāni + aham + veda + sarvāṇi)
- na tvaṃ vettha parantapaन त्वं वेत्थ परन्तप
- you do not know [them], O scorcher of the foe (na + tvam + vettha + parantapa)
Commentary
Site Commentary
Krishna doesn’t actually answer the question Arjuna asked — whether he really taught Vivasvân in the past — he answers a bigger question instead, about the nature of birth and memory generally. That’s a distinct rhetorical move from verse 2’s careful genealogy-building: rather than litigate the specific chronological detail, he steps back and reframes the premise the objection was standing on.
Original commentary written for this site · © Amit Singh — original commentary
Concepts
Apply this verse
Lessons
Personal
- When someone challenges you on a specific detail, consider whether the better response is stepping back to reframe the larger premise underneath it, rather than litigating that one detail on its own terms.
Professional
- When a stakeholder flags a small inconsistency in your plan, ask whether the real fix is patching that detail or revisiting the underlying model that produced it — sometimes the detail is a symptom, not the actual problem.
Family & Social
- When someone raises a specific complaint, look past the specific instance for the larger pattern it's pointing at — responding only to the detail can leave the real issue untouched.
Ask yourself
A few ways to take this verse past reading. Ticks and the note stay in this browser.