4.2

Sanskrit

एवं परम्पराप्राप्तमिमं राजर्षयो विदुः । स कालेनेह महता योगो नष्टः परन्तप ॥

evaṃ paramparā-prāptam imaṃ rājarṣayo viduḥ sa kāleneha mahatā yogo naṣṭaḥ parantapa

Translation

This, handed on down the line, the King-Sages knew. This yoga by great efflux of time decayed in the world, O Parantapa.

Annie Besant · The Bhagavad-Gita, translated by Annie Besant (4th ed., 1922) — Wikisource · Public Domain

Explanation

Continuing verse 1’s genealogy, Krishna adds that royal sages preserved this yoga through succession, until it decayed over the vast stretches of time — precisely the gap he is about to fill by re-teaching it to Arjuna. The word “decayed” does real work here: it frames what follows not as an innovation but as a restoration of something lost. Paramparā — teacher to student, link by link — is presented as the normal channel for this knowledge, and its failure as the reason a fresh transmission is needed. Chapter 4 both narrates a broken chain and, in BG 4.34, prescribes how to keep one intact.

Study deeper

Word by word

evaṃएवं
thus
paramparā-prāptamपरंपरा-प्राप्तं
received in unbroken succession (paramparā-prāptam)
imaṃइमं
this
rājarṣayoराजर्षयो
the royal sages (rāja-ṛṣayaḥ)
viduḥविदुः
knew
sa kāleneha mahatāस कालेनेह महता
but by the long passage of time here (saḥ + kālena + iha + mahatā)
yogoयोगो
the yoga
naṣṭaḥनष्टः
was lost
parantapaपरन्तप
O scorcher of the foe

Commentary

Site Commentary

Notice the rhetorical choice underneath the history lesson: Krishna is about to do something genuinely new — re-teach a yoga to someone outside the royal-sage line — but he frames it first as recovery of something lost, not as innovation. Positioning change as restoration rather than novelty is a persuasive move in its own right, one that shows up whenever a real departure needs the credibility of continuity to be accepted.

Original commentary written for this site · © Amit Singh — original commentary

Apply this verse

Lessons

Personal

  • When you want to make a real change in how you live, try framing it to yourself as recovering an original intention you drifted from, rather than as a brand-new resolution — restoration often sustains motivation longer than novelty does.

Professional

  • When proposing a real departure from how a team currently works, frame it as restoring the process's original purpose rather than as a new initiative — it lowers resistance and is often more accurate anyway, since most drift happens gradually and unnoticed.

Family & Social

  • When reviving a family practice that quietly lapsed, present it as bringing back something that mattered rather than introducing a new rule — it invites participation instead of resistance.

Ask yourself

A few ways to take this verse past reading. Ticks and the note stay in this browser.

Reflect on this verse

    ← 4.1Chapter 4 · 2 of 424.3 →