Sanskrit
न कर्मणामनारम्भान्नैष्कर्म्यं पुरुषोऽश्नुते । न च संन्यसनादेव सिद्धिं समधिगच्छति ॥
na karmaṇām anārambhān naiṣkarmyaṃ puruṣo'śnute na ca saṃnyasanād eva siddhiṃ samadhigacchati
Translation
Man winneth not freedom from action by abstaining from activity, nor by mere renunciation doth he rise to perfection.
Annie Besant · The Bhagavad-Gita, translated by Annie Besant (4th ed., 1922) — Wikisource · Public Domain
Explanation
This directly answers the assumption buried in Arjuna’s verse 1 — that not-acting is a viable alternative to acting. Krishna denies it on two fronts at once: refusing to start acting doesn’t itself grant freedom from action (naiṣkarmya), and formally renouncing (saṃnyāsa) doesn’t by itself deliver perfection either. Both half-measures fail; verse 5 explains why abstention is impossible in principle, not just inadvisable in practice. The distinction between naiṣkarmya (a real inner state where action no longer binds) and mere anārambha (not starting) is the one chapter 4’s akarma — “inaction in action” — is built to make precise. Not-doing is a posture; naiṣkarmya is an achievement.
Study deeper
Word by word
- na karmaṇām anārambhānन कर्मणां अनारंभान्
- not by abstaining from actions (na + karmaṇām + anārambhāt)
- naiṣkarmyaṃनैष्कर्ंयं
- freedom from action (naiṣkarmyam)
- puruṣo'śnuteपुरुषोऽश्नुते
- does a person attain (puruṣaḥ + aśnute)
- na ca saṃnyasanād evaन च संन्यसनाद् एव
- nor by renunciation alone (na + ca + saṃnyasanāt + eva)
- siddhiṃसिद्धिं
- perfection
- samadhigacchatiसमधिगच्छति
- does one reach
Commentary
Site Commentary
The verse’s two-part denial — not by non-action, nor by mere renunciation — is built to close off a third option Arjuna never stated but was clearly hoping existed: some quiet middle ground where doing nothing counts as doing enough. Structurally it’s an argument that eliminates the appealing exits before verse 5 names the deeper reason none of them were ever available.
Original commentary written for this site · © Amit Singh — original commentary
Concepts
Apply this verse
Lessons
Personal
- When you're stalling on a hard decision, notice if you're quietly hoping that simply not deciding will count as a legitimate third option — it rarely does, and naming that hope out loud is often what breaks the stall.
Professional
- When a team is stuck on a hard call, watch for someone treating 'let's just pause and revisit later' as a real third option rather than a delay dressed up as prudence — sometimes the honest move is naming that no-decision is itself a decision.
Family & Social
- When you're avoiding a difficult conversation with someone close to you, notice if you're treating silence as a safe middle ground — it usually isn't neutral, and naming that avoidance honestly is more respectful than letting it pass as inaction.
Ask yourself
A few ways to take this verse past reading. Ticks and the note stay in this browser.