3.13

Sanskrit

यज्ञशिष्टाशिनः सन्तो मुच्यन्ते सर्वकिल्बिषैः । भुञ्जते ते त्वघं पापा ये पचन्त्यात्मकारणात् ॥

yajñaśiṣṭāśinaḥ santo mucyante sarvakilbiṣaiḥ bhuñjate te tv aghaṃ pāpā ye pacanty ātmakāraṇāt

Translation

The righteous, who eat the remains of the sacrifice, are freed from all sins; but the impious, who dress food for their own sakes, they verily eat sin.

Annie Besant · The Bhagavad-Gita, translated by Annie Besant (4th ed., 1922) — Wikisource · Public Domain

Explanation

The theft charge from verse 12 gets its positive contrast: eating only what remains after offering is what the “righteous” do, and it’s this remainder-eating, not abstinence, that frees from wrongdoing. Cooking purely “for one’s own sake” is the same self-enclosed action verse 9 said binds — the language of eating here is a concrete stand-in for the whole chapter’s abstract claim about attachment. The test is not whether one eats but in what order: offer first, then take the leftover. Applied beyond the kitchen, it is the whole of karma-yoga — act for the offering, receive what follows as remainder.

Study deeper

Word by word

yajñaśiṣṭāśinaḥयज्ञशिष्टाशिनः
those who eat the remnant of sacrifice (yajña-śiṣṭa-aśinaḥ)
santoसन्तो
the good
mucyanteमुच्यन्ते
are freed
sarvakilbiṣaiḥसर्वकिल्बिषैः
from all sins (sarva-kilbiṣaiḥ)
bhuñjateभुञ्जते
eat
te tv aghaṃते त्व् अघं
but they [eat] sin (te + tu + agham)
pāpāपापा
the wicked
ye pacanty ātmakāraṇātये पचन्त्य् आत्मकारणात्
who cook for their own sake (ye + pacanti + ātma-kāraṇāt)

Commentary

Site Commentary

The chapter’s abstract claim about attachment gets translated into the most literal possible image: what you put in your mouth. Eating only what remains after offering versus cooking purely for yourself isn’t a separate rule about food — it’s the same non-attachment argument made physical enough that it can’t be dismissed as merely conceptual.

Original commentary written for this site · © Amit Singh — original commentary

Apply this verse

Lessons

Personal

  • Take whatever abstract principle you're struggling to actually live by and find its most literal, physical version — a habit involving your body, not just your intentions. Abstractions you agree with in theory become real once grounded in something as concrete as what you eat.

Professional

  • Take an abstract value your team claims to hold — 'customer-first,' 'quality' — and find its most literal, checkable version: a specific artifact, a specific step in the process. Values stay abstract and unenforced until someone grounds them in something as concrete as a checklist.

Family & Social

  • Take a value you want your family to actually live by — generosity, gratitude — and anchor it to a literal, physical habit, not just a conversation about it. A concrete practice makes an abstract value real in a way that talking about it alone never manages.

Ask yourself

A few ways to take this verse past reading. Ticks and the note stay in this browser.

Reflect on this verse

    Keep exploring

    Topics

    ← 3.12Chapter 3 · 13 of 433.14 →