Sanskrit
सर्वकर्माणि मनसा संन्यस्यास्ते सुखं वशी । नवद्वारे पुरे देही नैव कुर्वन्न कारयन् ॥
sarvakarmāṇi manasā sannyasyāste sukhaṃ vaśī navadvāre pure dehī naiva kurvan na kārayan
Translation
Mentally renouncing all actions, the sovereign dweller in the body resteth serenely in the nine-gated city, neither acting nor causing to act.
Annie Besant · The Bhagavad-Gita, translated by Annie Besant (4th ed., 1922) — Wikisource · Public Domain
Explanation
The nava-dvāra pura, the nine-gated city, is the body itself — two eyes, two ears, two nostrils, mouth, and the two organs of excretion — and the image recasts embodiment as architecture: a fortified dwelling with the self as sovereign resident (vaśī) rather than prisoner. Mental renunciation of all action is the operative phrase — not physical inactivity but a shift in identification, the dehī, the embodied self, recognizing that it neither acts nor causes action, since both belong to the instrument rather than the indweller. The formulation anticipates the distinction drawn over the next two verses, where the Self’s stillness and nature’s activity are held firmly apart. Vaśī — “the one in control,” the sovereign — is set against the ordinary sense of being trapped in a body: the dehī is a resident with authority, not an inmate. Verses 14–15 give this the metaphysical backing.
Study deeper
Word by word
- sarvakarmāṇi manasāसर्वकर्माणि मनसा
- all actions, by the mind (sarva-karmāṇi + manasā)
- sannyasyāste sukhaṃ vaśīसंन्यस्यास्ते सुखं वशी
- renouncing, the master dwells happily (sannyasya + āste + sukham + vaśī)
- navadvāre pure dehīनवद्वारे पुरे देही
- the embodied one, in the nine-gated city (nava-dvāre + pure + dehī)
- naiva kurvan na kārayanनैव कुर्वन् न कारयन्
- neither acting nor causing action (na + eva + kurvan + na + kārayan)
Commentary
Site Commentary
It would have been easy for this verse to reach for the well-worn image of the body as a prison the self is trapped in — many traditions do. Instead it calls the body a city and names the indwelling self vaśī, sovereign, its ruling resident rather than its captive. The difference in framing matters: a prisoner’s discipline is about enduring confinement, while a sovereign’s discipline is about right rule over a domain that’s actually theirs to govern.
Original commentary written for this site · © Amit Singh — original commentary
Site Commentary — Second Reading
The verse closes on a precise double negative — naiva kurvan na kārayan, neither doing nor causing to be done — which forecloses two separate escape routes at once: acting directly, and acting through delegation while claiming distance from the result. That second clause is easy to skip past, but it denies that arranging for something to happen counts as not-doing just because your own hands stayed clean. The indwelling self’s stillness isn’t a technicality achieved by outsourcing the action.
Original commentary written for this site · © Amit Singh — original commentary
Concepts
Apply this verse
Lessons
Personal
- If you think of your body or circumstances as a cage you're stuck in, try reframing them as a domain you actually govern — the discipline that follows from 'I am sovereign here' looks completely different from the discipline that follows from 'I am trapped here.'
Professional
- When you inherit a messy system or team you didn't choose, resist framing yourself as its prisoner — approaching it as territory you now govern, imperfect as it is, opens up actions that just enduring it never will.
Family & Social
- If a family responsibility feels like confinement, notice whether reframing it as something you govern rather than something you're trapped inside changes what you're willing to do about it — sovereignty and imprisonment call for very different kinds of action.
Ask yourself
A few ways to take this verse past reading. Ticks and the note stay in this browser.
Reflect on this verse
Keep exploring
Learning paths