Sanskrit
ये त्वक्षरमनिर्देश्यमव्यक्तं पर्युपासते । सर्वत्रगमचिन्त्यं च कूटस्थमचलं ध्रुवम् ॥
ye tv akṣaram anirdeśyam avyaktaṃ paryupāsate sarvatragam acintyaṃ ca kūṭastham acalaṃ dhruvam
Translation
They who worship the Indestructible, the Ineffable, the unmanifested, Omnipresent, and Unthinkable, the Unchanging, Immutable, Eternal,
Annie Besant · The Bhagavad-Gita, translated by Annie Besant (4th ed., 1922) — Wikisource · Public Domain
Explanation
Verses 3-4 describe the second path named in Arjuna’s question — the akṣara, the unmanifest absolute already discussed in Chapter 8’s account of Brahman. The description is a stack of negatives and near-negatives (indestructible, ineffable, unmanifest, unthinkable) rather than any positive attribute, consistent with how the Gita treats the formless absolute wherever it appears. The unmanifest is described entirely by negation — anirdeśya (indefinable), acintya (unthinkable), avyakta (unmanifest) — the Gita’s consistent apophatic treatment of the formless absolute, the same akṣara of BG 8.20–BG 8.21.
Study deeper
Word by word
- ye tv akṣaram anirdeśyamये त्व् अक्षरं अनिर्देश्यं
- but those who [worship] the indefinable Imperishable (ye + tu + akṣaram + anirdeśyam)
- avyaktaṃ paryupāsateअव्यक्तं पर्युपासते
- the unmanifest, worship (avyaktam + paryupāsate)
- sarvatragam acintyaṃ caसर्वत्रगं अचिन्त्यं च
- all-pervading and unthinkable (sarvatra-gam + acintyam + ca)
- kūṭastham acalaṃ dhruvamकूटस्थं अचलं ध्रुवं
- unchanging, immovable, constant (kūṭa-stham + acalam + dhruvam)
Commentary
Site Commentary
The unmanifest gets nine words here and every one of them is a negation. That’s not evasion — some things (the absolute, a person’s inner life, a hard decision not yet made) are genuinely easier to bound by what they refuse to be than to pin down by what they positively are, and this verse trusts that a true description doesn’t need a positive shape to be complete.
Original commentary written for this site · © Amit Singh — original commentary
Concepts
Apply this verse
Lessons
Personal
- When you can't yet say what you actually want — in a career, a relationship, yourself — start by listing what you know you don't want. The shape of the thing often becomes visible from its boundary before it's visible from its center.
Professional
- When scoping an ambiguous project, write down what's explicitly out of scope before attempting to define what's in it — negative constraints frequently produce clarity faster than a positive spec attempted from scratch.
Family & Social
- When setting a hard boundary with family, it's fine to lead with what you won't accept even if you haven't worked out the fully positive alternative yet — the boundary itself is real progress on its own.
Ask yourself
A few ways to take this verse past reading. Ticks and the note stay in this browser.